@sacerdotus Seriously, you debate like a child. you point to one book and say "Proof!" @nostradamnisuck @justfole @rosarubicondior
— Dave (@Dave_was_here) November 23, 2012
The above individual claims to have debated me, but no such record exists. I now challenge him to a debate here.
This is the debate and its rules:
God, can He be proven to exist?
Can He be proven not to exist?
Can He be proven not to exist?
- Both sides should provide coherent reasons supported by evidence.
- No ad hominem, vulgarity and the like.
- Arguments should be stable and not wander around.
- If an argument is not clear or is too complicated, questions can be posted within two asterisk (*) symbols. ie **What did you mean by....**
- The winner will be the one who has provided the strongest arguments.
- If any participant fails to continue, he/she will be disqualified and deemed the loser.
- No one other than Dave and Sacerdotus will be allowed to comment here.
Format:
Opening Speech - Opponent
Opening Speech - Sacerdotus
First Rebuttal - Opponent
First Rebuttal - Sacerdotus
Second Rebuttal - Opponent
Second Rebuttal - Sacerdotus
Closing Statement - Opponent
Closing Statement - Sacerdotus
________________________________________________________________________________
UPDATE: 2 weeks have passed and the Atheist coward never showed up.
________________________________________________________________________________
UPDATE: 2 weeks have passed and the Atheist coward never showed up.
Why do you want to debate in a forum you control and can silence me with a rule that states "If any participant fails to continue, he/she will be disqualified and deemed the loser"?
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like you plan to cheat.
1) Because I invited you to debate me. My rules.
Delete2) If you saw my last debate with "Rubicondior," the individual accepted to debate and then began to dilly dally wasting time. So, if there is to be a debate, both parties must participate. This would ensure the seriousness of the debate.