NOTICE: I have decided to put a hold on this blog page until further notice. No new comments will be allowed. The content will remain, but no new posts will be included. Please go to the alternate site to comment, discuss or debate:

This is a blog for discussions and debates regarding Faith and Reason.

Please be respectful, polite, use proper language, no profanity, stick to the topic discussion, no circular argumentation or fallacious reasoning, and avoid personal attacks/ad hominem.

All posts and original content are copyright Sacerdotus/Rationally Faithful. Whatever you post becomes property of this blog.

Please ask for permission before using any content and if permission is given, provide credit to the author, do not alter the content and backlink to the original post.

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Dave vs Sacerdotus

The above individual claims to have debated me, but no such record exists.  I now challenge him to a debate here.

This is the debate and its rules: 

God, can He be proven to exist?
Can He be proven not to exist?

  • Both sides should provide coherent reasons supported by evidence. 
  • No ad hominem, vulgarity and the like. 
  • Arguments should be stable and not wander around. 
  • If an argument is not clear or is too complicated, questions can be posted within two asterisk (*) symbols. ie **What did you mean by....** 
  • The winner will be the one who has provided the strongest arguments.
  • If any participant fails to continue, he/she will be disqualified and deemed the loser.  
  • No one other than Dave and Sacerdotus will be allowed to comment here.


Opening Speech - Opponent

Opening Speech  - Sacerdotus

First Rebuttal - Opponent

First Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Second Rebuttal - Opponent

Second Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Closing Statement - Opponent

Closing Statement  - Sacerdotus


UPDATE:  2 weeks have passed and the Atheist coward never showed up.  


  1. Why do you want to debate in a forum you control and can silence me with a rule that states "If any participant fails to continue, he/she will be disqualified and deemed the loser"?

    It sounds like you plan to cheat.

    1. 1) Because I invited you to debate me. My rules.
      2) If you saw my last debate with "Rubicondior," the individual accepted to debate and then began to dilly dally wasting time. So, if there is to be a debate, both parties must participate. This would ensure the seriousness of the debate.

Thank you for reading and for your comment. Please be patient if you posted a comment. Spammers and other people who hide under "anonymous" sometimes post vulgar or nonsensical comments that I cannot post for obvious reasons. If your comment pertains to the posting and is free of ad hominem and vulgarity, rest assured it will be posted.


Sacerdotus Radio

Find Additional Christianity Podcasts with Sacerdotus on BlogTalkRadio