@sacerd0tus my offer of a debate on your assertion that empiricism may be used to prove the absence of the supernatural. Then we can start!
— HastonianBarbarian (@StevieBryant) May 12, 2013
@sacerd0tus what fear? I will debate you on Skype or blog and conclusively disprove your version of god, given just one simple condition.
— HastonianBarbarian (@StevieBryant) May 12, 2013
Rules:
- Both sides should provide coherent reasons supported by evidence.
- No ad hominem, vulgarity and the like.
- Arguments should be stable and not wander around.
- If an argument is not clear or too complicated, questions can be posted within two asterisk (*) symbols. ie **What did you mean by....**
- The winner will be the one who has provided the strongest argument.
- No one other than Stevie Bryant and Sacerdotus will be allowed to comment.
Format:
Opening Speech - Opponent
Opening Speech - Sacerdotus
First Rebuttal - Opponent
First Rebuttal - Sacerdotus
Second Rebuttal - Opponent
Second Rebuttal - Sacerdotus
Closing Statement - Opponent
Closing Statement - Sacerdotus
