Ms Grumpy vs Sacerdotus

@sacerdotus @mikecannytalk @prophecy_yec @logicbobomb @karlmeyer I'll debate you right now..on Twitter you coward
— Idiot Immolator (@MsGrumpy) February 25, 2013

This is the debate and its rules:



God, can He be proven to exist?
Can He be proven not to exist?



Both sides should provide coherent reasons supported by evidence.
No ad hominem, vulgarity and the like.
Arguments should be stable and not wander around.
If an argument is not clear or is too complicated, questions can be posted within two asterisk (*) symbols. ie **What did you mean by....**
The winner will be the one who has provided the strongest arguments.
If any participant fails to continue, he/she will be disqualified and deemed the loser.
No one other than Idiot Grumpy and Sacerdotus will be allowed to comment here.

Format:

Opening Speech - Opponent

Opening Speech  - Sacerdotus



First Rebuttal - Opponent

First Rebuttal - Sacerdotus




Second Rebuttal - Opponent

Second Rebuttal - Sacerdotus



Closing Statement - Opponent

Closing Statement  - Sacerdotus




****************************

Idiot Grumpy had till 12 midnight Eastern time to post an opening statement and failed to do so.  She has therefore forfeited the debate and is declared the loser.  Perhaps when she musters up some courage, we can truly debate.

Brian Fuller vs Sacerdotus

https://twitter.com/TheBrianFuller/status/303604116305883136
https://twitter.com/TheBrianFuller/status/303601188933341184
https://twitter.com/TheBrianFuller/status/303445613771620352




March 11, 2013 - Brian still did not show up, so he forfeits.  He is declared the loser of the debate for not showing up.





This is the debate and its rules: 

God, can He be proven to exist?
Can He be proven not to exist? 

• Both sides should provide coherent reasons supported by evidence. 
• No ad hominem, vulgarity and the like. 
• Arguments should be stable and not wander around. 
• If an argument is not clear or is too complicated, questions can be posted within two asterisk (*) symbols. ie **What did you mean by....** 
• The winner will be the one who has provided the strongest arguments.
• If any participant fails to continue, he/she will be disqualified and deemed the loser.  
• No one other than Brian Fuller and Sacerdotus will be allowed to comment here.

Format:

Opening Speech - Opponent

Opening Speech  - Sacerdotus

First Rebuttal - Opponent

First Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Second Rebuttal - Opponent

Second Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Closing Statement - Opponent

Closing Statement  - Sacerdotus

Bible Reloaded Vs Sacerdotus

@yhwh_thelordgod @sacerdotus @steviebryant @rosarubicondior Yeah I already agreed to debate. We can do it on anything...
— The Bible Reloaded (@BibleReloaded) February 14, 2013

Why is @sacerdotus afraid to debate me?
— The Bible Reloaded (@BibleReloaded) February 14, 2013

***UPDATE***

"Bible Reloaded" has not countered my response in over 2 months and has therefore forfeited.  He is declared the loser of the debate.




This is the debate and its rules: 

God, can He be proven to exist?
Can He be proven not to exist? 

• Both sides should provide coherent reasons supported by evidence. 
• No ad hominem, vulgarity and the like. 
• Arguments should be stable and not wander around. 
• If an argument is not clear or is too complicated, questions can be posted within two asterisk (*) symbols. ie **What did you mean by....** 
• The winner will be the one who has provided the strongest arguments.
• If any participant fails to continue, he/she will be disqualified and deemed the loser.  
• No one other than Bible Reloaded and Sacerdotus will be allowed to comment here.

Format:

Opening Speech - Opponent

Opening Speech  - Sacerdotus

First Rebuttal - Opponent

First Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Second Rebuttal - Opponent

Second Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Closing Statement - Opponent

Closing Statement  - Sacerdotus