Debate Challenge To Rosa Rubicondior

Since Rosa Rubicondior lost the last debate by forfeit.  I will give him another chance at redemption.  

I challenge him to a video debate on Skype that will be broadcast on Twitter, Facebook, my blog and You Tube.  In this debate, both parties must rely solely on science in order to answer the follow:

• God, can He be proven to exist?  
• Can He be proven not to exist?

The rules are as follow:

1. Both sides must provide coherent reasons supported by evidence.
2. No ad hominem, vulgarity and the like or face forfeit.
3. Arguments should be stable and not digress.
4. If an argument is not clear or too complicated, questions can be posted within two asterisk (*) symbols. ie **What did you mean by....**
5. The winner will be the one who has provided the strongest argument and maintained logical coherence.
6. No one other than RosaRubicondior and Sacerdotus will be allowed to comment or participate.  

Format:

Opening Speech - Opponent

Opening Speech  - Sacerdotus

First Rebuttal - Opponent

First Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Second Rebuttal - Opponent

Second Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Closing Statement - Opponent

Closing Statement  - Sacerdotus

Comment on Rosa Rubicondior vs Sacerdotus

  VS  

The debate was not what most expected; nevertheless, it is what it is.  I knew Rosa would get cold feet and find all kinds of ways to get out of the debate.

The numerous times that I corrected her blog opinions with science and how she deleted them showed to me that she just wants attention and is not serious about truth.  She is more concerned about always being right even when the facts speak against her.

This debate exposed her completely.  It is no wonder why her Atheist friends are flooding my Twitter mentions with all kinds of supportive comments, strange comments and of course, attacks.

When the shepherd is hit, the sheep will scatter and this is what is happening.  I hit the "great vocal" Atheist "Nope," hard and her blind sheep are scattered.

Some of you posted comments on the debate blog -I specifically stated not to, but Atheists are not good at reading :) - nevertheless, I started this post so that all can comment on the debate.

• All I ask is for the comments to be free of vulgarity, profanity, ad hominem, prevarication and the like. 
• Keep it simple and do not attack Rose or me. 
• I will not post any comment that does not comply with the aforementioned.

Here are the comments that were posted during the debate which I did not approve because only Rosa was allowed to post there.

The verdict is in and @rosarubicondior is declared the loser of the debate for good.  Every attempt has been made to continue the debate and instead Rubicondior resorts to ad hominem and falsely applying another's identity on me in order to distract.  It is obvious that Rubicondior is an internet troll seeking only attention and is not serious about atheism.  Rubicondior is the reason why many abandon atheism and join religion, hence why atheism has a short retention.  

Any religious individual reading this blog post should block and report rubicondior as spam.  He is nothing but a waste of time and has serious psychiatric issues.  I hope he gets the help needed.  Let us pray for this troubled soul.    

Debate Rosarubicondior vs Sacerdotus

Rosa finally accepted my challenge after much distraction and dilly dallying:

https://twitter.com/RosaRubicondior/status/237472676111867904

• God, can He be proven to exist?  
• Can He be proven not to exist?

1. Both sides should provide coherent reasons supported by evidence.
2. No ad hominem, vulgarity and the like.
3. Arguments should be stable and not wander around.
4. If an argument is not clear or too complicated, questions can be posted within two asterisk (*) symbols. ie **What did you mean by....**
5. The winner will be the one who has provided the strongest argument.
6. No one other than RosaRubicondior and Sacerdotus will be allowed to comment.  

Format:

Opening Speech - Opponent

Opening Speech  - Sacerdotus

First Rebuttal - Opponent

First Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Second Rebuttal - Opponent

Second Rebuttal - Sacerdotus

Closing Statement - Opponent

Closing Statement  - Sacerdotus

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

UPDATE:  August 21, 2012 9:00 PM Easter time,

Rosa Rubicondior has forfeited and is declared the loser of the debate.  She has, by her own will, bowed out of the debate.  She has even blocked my Twitter.   I wish Rosa well and am disappointed that she did not trust her Atheistic reasoning enough to debate me.  Hopefully she will study more and prepare for a future debate if she wishes to try again.  I am open to debate her or any Atheist.



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

UPDATE May 16, 2013

The verdict is in and @rosarubicondior is declared the loser of the debate for good.  Every attempt has been made to continue the debate and instead Rubicondior resorts to ad hominem and falsely applying another's identity on me in order to distract.  It is obvious that Rubicondior is an internet troll seeking only attention and is not serious about atheism.  Rubicondior is the reason why many abandon atheism and join religion, hence why atheism has a short retention.  

Any religious individual reading this blog post should block and report rubicondior as spam.  He is nothing but a waste of time and has serious psychiatric issues.  I hope he gets the help needed.  Let us pray for this troubled soul.